About Dr Dush Shan

QUALIFICATIONS

Dr Dush Shan is a Medical Specialist in Psychiatry.  He graduated from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Melbourne in 1977. He then worked as a doctor before becoming a Psychiatry Trainee/Registrar between 1980 and 1985. In 1985 he obtained the specialist qualification of Fellowship of the Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (FRANZCP). 
 
CLINICAL APPOINTMENTS
 
Upon obtaining the specialist qualification, he held positions as Unit Head at the Footscray Psychiatric Hospital followed by the Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital.  He also began a private practice in Moonee Ponds, a suburb of Melbourne, Australia.  With the expansion of the private practice, Dr Shan moved to consultation liaison psychiatry positions at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne
 
Consultation liaison psychiatry consists of work in the medical and surgical wards of a public hospital including the Emergency Department and Trauma Units.  During this period, Dr Shan was often required to make determinations about admissions and treatment under the Mental Health Act.
 
From 2007 to 2021, Dr Shan worked at the Caulfield Campus of Alfred Health as the sessional consultant psychiatrist to the Caulfield Pain Management Centre. 
 
From 1995 to the present, Dr Shan has been principal specialist and director of the Norwood Specialist Centre in Moonee Ponds where his main clinical practice has been located.
 
INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINER
 
Dr Shan has been an independent medical examiner for the Victorian WorkCover Authority and Transport Accident Commission since 1994 and is also an impairment examiner and independent medical examiner in other jurisdictions such as New South Wales WorkCover and Comcare.  Between 2002 and 2010 Dr Shan was a panellist on the Medical Panels, Victoria.
 
Dr Shan has conducted in excess of 300 independent examinations each year for 20 years in a range of matters.  The reports have assisted in the resolution of the majority of such matters without court proceedings or judgements being needed.  This is reflected in the comparatively small proportion of judgements that refer to Dr Shan’s reports on the Australasian Legal Information Institute database (http://www.austlii.edu.au/)
 
Some judgements illustrative of the complexities of opinion are below:
 
Jackson v Woolworths Limited, Magistrates’ Court of Victoria (19 October 2011)
Sejranovic v Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd, Supreme Court of Victoria 108 (22 May 2009)
Woolworths Ltd v Warfe, Supreme Court of Victoria 22 (19 February 2013)
Goldsmith v SPC Ardmona Operations Ltd, Supreme Court of Victoria 445 (5 October 2009)
Norris v Brumar (Victoria) Pty Ltd, Supreme Court of Victoria 218 (9 June 2009)
Montclare v Metlife Insurance Ltd, Supreme Court of Victoria 306 (25 June 2015)
Willett v State of Victoria, Supreme Court of Victoria 76 (12 April 2013)
Dyer and Comcare, Administrative Appeals Tribunal of Australia 748 (25 October 2011)   
 
Psychiatric medicolegal work leads to controversial claimants being seen and sometimes results in unwarranted complaints together with anonymous trolling behaviour and false allegations on questionable websites.  While the investigation of complaints against registered medical practitioners is generally confidential, the public can reassure themselves by checking for any negative findings against a practitioner on the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) website which is updated regularly.